bg_image
header

Write Through

Write-Through is a caching strategy that ensures every change (write operation) to the data is synchronously written to both the cache and the underlying data store (e.g., a database). This ensures that the cache is always consistent with the underlying data source, meaning that a read access to the cache always provides the most up-to-date and consistent data.

How Write-Through Works

  1. Write Operation: When an application modifies a record, the change is simultaneously applied to the cache and the permanent data store.
  2. Synchronization: The cache is immediately updated with the new values, and the change is also written to the database.
  3. Read Access: For future read accesses, the latest values are directly available in the cache, without needing to access the database.

Advantages of Write-Through

  1. High Data Consistency: Since every write operation is immediately applied to both the cache and the data store, the data in both systems is always in sync.
  2. Simple Implementation: Write-Through is relatively straightforward to implement, as it doesn’t require complex consistency rules.
  3. Reduced Cache Invalidation Overhead: Since the cache always holds the most up-to-date data, there is no need for separate cache invalidation.

Disadvantages of Write-Through

  1. Higher Latency for Write Operations: Because the data is synchronously written to both the cache and the database, the write operations are slower than with other caching strategies like Write-Back.
  2. Increased Write Load: Each write operation generates load on both the cache and the permanent storage. This can lead to increased system utilization in high-write scenarios.
  3. No Protection Against Failures: If the database is unavailable, the cache cannot handle write operations alone and may cause a failure.

Use Cases for Write-Through

  • Read-Heavy Applications: Write-Through is often used in scenarios where the number of read operations is significantly higher than the number of write operations, as reads can directly access the cache.
  • High Consistency Requirements: Write-Through is ideal when the application requires a very high data consistency between the cache and the data store.
  • Simple Data Models: It’s suitable for applications with relatively simple data structures and fewer dependencies between different records, making it easier to implement.

Summary

Write-Through is a caching strategy that ensures consistency between the cache and data store by performing every change on both storage locations simultaneously. This strategy is particularly useful when consistency and simplicity are more critical than maximizing write speed. However, in scenarios with frequent write operations, the increased latency can become an issue.

 


Closed Source

Closed Source (also known as Proprietary Software) refers to software whose source code is not publicly accessible and can only be viewed, modified, or distributed by the owner or developer. In contrast to Open Source software, where the source code is made publicly available, Closed Source software keeps the source code strictly confidential.

Characteristics of Closed Source Software:

  1. Protected Source Code: The source code is not visible to the public. Only the developer or the company owning the software has access to it, preventing third parties from understanding the internal workings or making changes.

  2. License Restrictions: Closed Source software is usually distributed under restrictive licenses that strictly regulate usage, modification, and redistribution. Users are only allowed to use the software within the terms set by the license.

  3. Access Restrictions: Only authorized developers or teams within the company have permission to modify the code or add new features.

  4. Commercial Use: Closed Source software is often offered as a commercial product. Users typically need to purchase a license or subscribe to use the software. Common examples include Microsoft Office and Adobe Photoshop.

  5. Lower Transparency: Users cannot verify the code for vulnerabilities or hidden features (e.g., backdoors). This can be a concern if security and trust are important factors.

Advantages of Closed Source Software:

  1. Protection of Intellectual Property: Companies protect their source code to prevent others from copying their business logic, algorithms, or special implementations.
  2. Stability and Support: Since the developer has full control over the code, quality assurance is typically more stringent. Additionally, many Closed Source vendors offer robust technical support and regular updates.
  3. Lower Risk of Code Manipulation: Since third parties have no access, there’s a reduced risk of unwanted code changes or the introduction of vulnerabilities from external sources.

Disadvantages of Closed Source Software:

  1. No Customization Options: Users cannot customize the software to their specific needs or fix bugs independently, as they lack access to the source code.
  2. Costs: Closed Source software often involves licensing fees or subscription costs, which can be expensive for businesses.
  3. Dependence on the Vendor: Users rely entirely on the vendor to fix bugs, patch security issues, or add new features.

Examples of Closed Source Software:

Some well-known Closed Source programs and platforms include:

  • Microsoft Windows: The operating system is Closed Source, and its code is owned by Microsoft.
  • Adobe Creative Suite: Photoshop, Illustrator, and other Adobe products are proprietary.
  • Apple iOS and macOS: These operating systems are Closed Source, meaning users can only use the officially provided versions.
  • Proprietary Databases like Oracle Database: These are Closed Source and do not allow access to the internal code.

Difference Between Open Source and Closed Source:

  • Open Source: The source code is freely available, and anyone can view, modify, and distribute it (under specific conditions depending on the license).
  • Closed Source: The source code is not accessible, and usage and distribution are heavily restricted.

Summary:

Closed Source software is proprietary software whose source code is not publicly available. It is typically developed and offered commercially by companies. Users can use the software, but they cannot view or modify the source code. This provides benefits in terms of intellectual property protection and quality assurance but sacrifices flexibility and transparency.

 


Module

A module in software development is a self-contained unit or component of a larger system that performs a specific function or task. It operates independently but often works with other modules to enable the overall functionality of the system. Modules are designed to be independently developed, tested, and maintained, which increases flexibility and code reusability.

Key characteristics of a module include:

  1. Encapsulation: A module hides its internal details and exposes only a defined interface (API) for interacting with other modules.
  2. Reusability: Modules are designed for specific tasks, making them reusable in other programs or projects.
  3. Independence: Modules are as independent as possible, so changes in one module don’t directly affect others.
  4. Testability: Each module can be tested separately, which simplifies debugging and ensures higher quality.

Examples of modules include functions for user management, database access, or payment processing within a software application.

 


Modulith

A Modulith is a term from software architecture that combines the concepts of a module and a monolith. It refers to a software module that is relatively independent but still part of a larger monolithic system. Unlike a pure monolith, which is a tightly coupled and often difficult-to-scale system, a modulith organizes the code into more modular and maintainable components with clear separation of concerns.

The core idea of a modulith is to structure the system in a way that allows parts of it to be modular, making it easier to decouple and break down into smaller pieces without having to redesign the entire monolithic system. While it is still deployed as part of a monolith, it has better organization and could be on the path toward a microservices-like architecture.

A modulith is often seen as a transitional step between a traditional monolith architecture and a microservices architecture, aiming for more modularity over time without completely abandoning the complexity of a monolithic system.

 


Contract Driven Development - CDD

Contract Driven Development (CDD) is a software development approach that focuses on defining and using contracts between different components or services. These contracts clearly specify how various software parts should interact with each other. CDD is commonly used in microservices architectures or API development to ensure that communication between independent modules is accurate and consistent.

Key Concepts of CDD

  1. Contracts as a Single Source of Truth:

    • A contract is a formal specification (e.g., in JSON or YAML) of a service or API that describes which endpoints, parameters, data formats, and communication expectations exist.
    • The contract is treated as the central resource upon which both client and server components are built.
  2. Separation of Implementation and Contract:

    • The implementation of a service or component must comply with the defined contract.
    • Clients (users of this service) build their requests based on the contract, independent of the actual server-side implementation.
  3. Contract-Driven Testing:

    • A core aspect of CDD is using automated contract tests to verify compliance with the contract. These tests ensure that the interaction between different components adheres to the specified expectations.
    • For example, a Consumer-Driven Contract test can be used to ensure that the data and formats expected by the consumer are provided by the provider.

Benefits of Contract Driven Development

  1. Clear Interface Definition: Explicit specification of contracts clarifies how components interact, reducing misunderstandings and errors.
  2. Independent Development: Teams developing different services or components can work in parallel as long as they adhere to the defined contract.
  3. Simplified Integration and Testing: Since contracts serve as the foundation, mock servers or clients can be created based on these specifications, enabling integration testing without requiring all components to be available.
  4. Increased Consistency and Reliability: Automated contract tests ensure that changes in one service do not negatively impact other systems.

Use Cases for CDD

  • Microservices Architectures: In complex distributed systems, CDD helps define and stabilize communication between services.
  • API Development: In API development, a contract ensures that the exposed interface meets the expectations of users (e.g., other teams or external customers).
  • Consumer-Driven Contracts: For consumer-driven contracts (e.g., using tools like Pact), consumers of a service define the expected interactions, and providers ensure that their services fulfill these expectations.

Disadvantages and Challenges of CDD

  1. Management Overhead:

    • Maintaining and updating contracts can be challenging, especially with many services involved or in a dynamic environment.
  2. Versioning and Backward Compatibility:

    • If contracts change, both providers and consumers need to be synchronized, which can require complex coordination.
  3. Over-Documentation:

    • In some cases, CDD can lead to an excessive focus on documentation, reducing flexibility.

Conclusion

Contract Driven Development is especially suitable for projects with many independent components where clear and stable interfaces are essential. It helps prevent misunderstandings and ensures that the communication between services remains robust through automated testing. However, the added complexity of managing contracts needs to be considered.

 


Captain Hook

CaptainHook is a PHP-based Git hook manager that helps developers automate tasks related to Git repositories. It allows you to easily configure and manage Git hooks, which are scripts that run automatically at certain points during the Git workflow (e.g., before committing or pushing code). This is particularly useful for enforcing coding standards, running tests, validating commit messages, or preventing bad code from being committed.

CaptainHook can be integrated into projects via Composer, and it offers flexibility for customizing hooks and plugins, making it easy to enforce project-specific rules. It supports multiple PHP versions, with the latest requiring PHP 8.0​.

 

 


Entity

An Entity is a central concept in software development, particularly in Domain-Driven Design (DDD). It refers to an object or data record that has a unique identity and whose state can change over time. The identity of an entity remains constant, regardless of how its attributes change.

Key Characteristics of an Entity:

  1. Unique Identity: Every entity has a unique identifier (e.g., an ID) that distinguishes it from other entities. This identity is the primary distinguishing feature and remains the same throughout the entity’s lifecycle.

  2. Mutable State: Unlike a value object, an entity’s state can change. For example, a customer’s properties (like name or address) may change, but the customer remains the same through its unique identity.

  3. Business Logic: Entities often encapsulate business logic that relates to their behavior and state within the domain.

Example of an Entity:

Consider a Customer entity in an e-commerce system. This entity could have the following attributes:

  • ID: 12345 (the unique identity of the customer)
  • Name: John Doe
  • Address: 123 Main Street, Some City

If the customer’s name or address changes, the entity is still the same customer because of its unique ID. This is the key difference from a Value Object, which does not have a persistent identity.

Entities in Practice:

Entities are often represented as database tables, where the unique identity is stored as a primary key. In an object-oriented programming model, entities are typically represented by a class or object that manages the entity's logic and state.

 


Green IT

Green IT (short for "green information technology") refers to the environmentally friendly and sustainable use of IT resources and technologies. The goal of Green IT is to minimize the ecological footprint of the IT industry while maximizing the efficiency of energy and resource use. It covers the entire lifecycle of IT devices, including their production, operation, and disposal.

The key aspects of Green IT are:

  1. Energy Efficiency: Reducing the power consumption of IT systems such as servers, data centers, networks, and end-user devices.

  2. Extending Device Lifespan: Encouraging the reuse and repair of hardware to decrease the demand for new production and associated resource consumption.

  3. Resource-Efficient Manufacturing: Using environmentally friendly materials and efficient production processes in the manufacturing of IT devices.

  4. Optimization of Data Centers: Leveraging technologies like virtualization, cloud computing, and energy-efficient cooling systems to reduce the power consumption of servers and data centers.

  5. Recycling and Eco-Friendly Disposal: Ensuring that old IT devices are properly recycled or disposed of to minimize environmental impact.

Green IT is part of the broader concept of sustainability in the IT industry and is becoming increasingly important as energy consumption and resource demand grow with the ongoing digitalization and widespread use of technology.

 


Conventional Commits

Conventional Commits are a simple standard for commit messages in Git that propose a consistent format for all commits. This consistency facilitates automation tasks such as version control, changelog generation, and tracking changes.

The format of Conventional Commits follows a structured pattern, typically as:

<type>[optional scope]: <description>

[optional body]

[optional footer(s)]

Components of a Conventional Commit:

  1. Type (Required): Describes the type of change in the commit. Standard types include:

    • feat: A new feature or functionality.
    • fix: A bug fix.
    • docs: Documentation changes.
    • style: Code style changes (e.g., formatting) that don't affect the logic.
    • refactor: Code changes that neither fix a bug nor add features but improve the code.
    • test: Adding or modifying tests.
    • chore: Changes to the build process or auxiliary tools that don't affect the source code.
  2. Scope (Optional): Describes the section of the code or application affected, such as a module or component.

    • Example: fix(auth): corrected password hashing algorithm
  3. Description (Required): A short, concise description of the change, written in the imperative form (e.g., “add feature” instead of “added feature”).

  4. Body (Optional): A more detailed description of the change, providing additional context or technical details.

  5. Footer (Optional): Used for notes about breaking changes or references to issues or tickets.

    • Example: BREAKING CHANGE: remove deprecated authentication method

Example of a Conventional Commit message:

feat(parser): add ability to parse arrays

The parser now supports parsing arrays into lists.
This allows arrays to be passed as arguments to methods.

BREAKING CHANGE: Arrays are now parsed differently

Benefits of Conventional Commits:

  • Consistency: A uniform format for commit messages makes the project history easier to understand.
  • Automation: Tools can automatically generate versions, create changelogs, and even release builds based on commit messages.
  • Traceability: It becomes easier to track the purpose of a change, especially for bug fixes or new features.

Conventional Commits are especially helpful in projects using SemVer (Semantic Versioning) because they enable automatic versioning based on commit types.

 

 

 


Phan

Phan is a static analysis tool for PHP designed to identify and fix potential issues in code before it is executed. It analyzes PHP code for type errors, logic mistakes, and possible runtime issues. Phan is particularly useful for handling type safety in PHP, especially with the introduction of strict types in newer PHP versions.

Here are some of Phan's main features:

  1. Type Checking: Phan checks PHP code for type errors, ensuring that variables, functions, and return values match their expected types.
  2. Undefined Methods and Functions Detection: Phan ensures that called methods, functions, or classes are actually defined, avoiding runtime errors.
  3. Dead Code Detection: It identifies unused or unnecessary code, which can be removed to improve code readability and maintainability.
  4. PHPDoc Support: Phan uses PHPDoc comments to provide additional type information and checks if the documentation matches the actual code.
  5. Compatibility Checks: It checks whether the code is compatible with different PHP versions, helping with upgrades to newer versions of PHP.
  6. Custom Plugins: Phan supports custom plugins, allowing developers to implement specific checks or requirements for their projects.

Phan is a lightweight tool that integrates well into development workflows and helps catch common PHP code issues early. It is particularly suited for projects that prioritize type safety and code quality.