bg_image
header

Closed Source

Closed Source (also known as Proprietary Software) refers to software whose source code is not publicly accessible and can only be viewed, modified, or distributed by the owner or developer. In contrast to Open Source software, where the source code is made publicly available, Closed Source software keeps the source code strictly confidential.

Characteristics of Closed Source Software:

  1. Protected Source Code: The source code is not visible to the public. Only the developer or the company owning the software has access to it, preventing third parties from understanding the internal workings or making changes.

  2. License Restrictions: Closed Source software is usually distributed under restrictive licenses that strictly regulate usage, modification, and redistribution. Users are only allowed to use the software within the terms set by the license.

  3. Access Restrictions: Only authorized developers or teams within the company have permission to modify the code or add new features.

  4. Commercial Use: Closed Source software is often offered as a commercial product. Users typically need to purchase a license or subscribe to use the software. Common examples include Microsoft Office and Adobe Photoshop.

  5. Lower Transparency: Users cannot verify the code for vulnerabilities or hidden features (e.g., backdoors). This can be a concern if security and trust are important factors.

Advantages of Closed Source Software:

  1. Protection of Intellectual Property: Companies protect their source code to prevent others from copying their business logic, algorithms, or special implementations.
  2. Stability and Support: Since the developer has full control over the code, quality assurance is typically more stringent. Additionally, many Closed Source vendors offer robust technical support and regular updates.
  3. Lower Risk of Code Manipulation: Since third parties have no access, there’s a reduced risk of unwanted code changes or the introduction of vulnerabilities from external sources.

Disadvantages of Closed Source Software:

  1. No Customization Options: Users cannot customize the software to their specific needs or fix bugs independently, as they lack access to the source code.
  2. Costs: Closed Source software often involves licensing fees or subscription costs, which can be expensive for businesses.
  3. Dependence on the Vendor: Users rely entirely on the vendor to fix bugs, patch security issues, or add new features.

Examples of Closed Source Software:

Some well-known Closed Source programs and platforms include:

  • Microsoft Windows: The operating system is Closed Source, and its code is owned by Microsoft.
  • Adobe Creative Suite: Photoshop, Illustrator, and other Adobe products are proprietary.
  • Apple iOS and macOS: These operating systems are Closed Source, meaning users can only use the officially provided versions.
  • Proprietary Databases like Oracle Database: These are Closed Source and do not allow access to the internal code.

Difference Between Open Source and Closed Source:

  • Open Source: The source code is freely available, and anyone can view, modify, and distribute it (under specific conditions depending on the license).
  • Closed Source: The source code is not accessible, and usage and distribution are heavily restricted.

Summary:

Closed Source software is proprietary software whose source code is not publicly available. It is typically developed and offered commercially by companies. Users can use the software, but they cannot view or modify the source code. This provides benefits in terms of intellectual property protection and quality assurance but sacrifices flexibility and transparency.

 


Source Code

Source code (also referred to as code or source text) is the human-readable set of instructions written by programmers to define the functionality and behavior of a program. It consists of a sequence of commands and statements written in a specific programming language, such as Java, Python, C++, JavaScript, and many others.

Characteristics of Source Code:

  1. Human-readable: Source code is designed to be readable and understandable by humans. It is often structured with comments and well-organized commands to make the logic easier to follow.

  2. Programming Languages: Source code is written in different programming languages, each with its own syntax and rules. Every language is suited for specific purposes and applications.

  3. Machine-independent: Source code in its raw form is not directly executable. It must be translated into machine-readable code (machine code) so that the computer can understand and execute it. This translation is done by a compiler or an interpreter.

  4. Editing and Maintenance: Developers can modify, extend, and improve source code to add new features or fix bugs. The source code is the foundation for all further development and maintenance activities of a software project.

Example:

A simple example in Python to show what source code looks like:

# A simple Python source code that prints "Hello, World!"
print("Hello, World!")

This code consists of a single command (print) that outputs the text "Hello, World!" on the screen. Although it is just one line, the interpreter (in this case, the Python interpreter) must read, understand, and translate the source code into machine code so that the computer can execute the instruction.

Usage and Importance:

Source code is the core of any software development. It defines the logic, behavior, and functionality of software. Some key aspects of source code are:

  • Program Control: The source code controls the execution of the program and contains instructions for flow control, computations, and data processing.
  • Collaboration: In software projects, multiple developers often work together. Source code is managed in version control systems like Git to facilitate collaboration.
  • Open or Closed: Some software projects release their source code as Open Source, allowing other developers to view, modify, and use it. For proprietary software, the source code is usually kept private (Closed Source).

Summary:

Source code is the fundamental, human-readable text that makes up software programs. It is written by developers to define a program's functionality and must be translated into machine code by a compiler or interpreter before a computer can execute it.

 

 


Captain Hook

CaptainHook is a PHP-based Git hook manager that helps developers automate tasks related to Git repositories. It allows you to easily configure and manage Git hooks, which are scripts that run automatically at certain points during the Git workflow (e.g., before committing or pushing code). This is particularly useful for enforcing coding standards, running tests, validating commit messages, or preventing bad code from being committed.

CaptainHook can be integrated into projects via Composer, and it offers flexibility for customizing hooks and plugins, making it easy to enforce project-specific rules. It supports multiple PHP versions, with the latest requiring PHP 8.0​.

 

 


Breaking Changes

Breaking Changes refer to modifications in software, an API, or a library that cause existing code or dependencies to stop functioning as expected. These changes break backward compatibility, meaning older versions of the code that rely on the previous version will no longer work without adjustments.

Typical examples of Breaking Changes include:

  1. Changing or Removing Functions: A function that previously existed is either removed or behaves differently.
  2. Modifying Interfaces: When the parameters of a method or API are changed, existing code that uses this method might throw errors.
  3. Changes in Data Structures: Modifications to data formats or models can render existing code incompatible.
  4. Behavioral Changes: If the behavior of the code is fundamentally altered (e.g., from synchronous to asynchronous), this often requires adjustments in the calling code.

Dealing with Breaking Changes usually involves developers updating or adapting their software to remain compatible with new versions. Typically, Breaking Changes are introduced in major version releases to signal to users that there may be incompatibilities.

 


Conventional Commits

Conventional Commits are a simple standard for commit messages in Git that propose a consistent format for all commits. This consistency facilitates automation tasks such as version control, changelog generation, and tracking changes.

The format of Conventional Commits follows a structured pattern, typically as:

<type>[optional scope]: <description>

[optional body]

[optional footer(s)]

Components of a Conventional Commit:

  1. Type (Required): Describes the type of change in the commit. Standard types include:

    • feat: A new feature or functionality.
    • fix: A bug fix.
    • docs: Documentation changes.
    • style: Code style changes (e.g., formatting) that don't affect the logic.
    • refactor: Code changes that neither fix a bug nor add features but improve the code.
    • test: Adding or modifying tests.
    • chore: Changes to the build process or auxiliary tools that don't affect the source code.
  2. Scope (Optional): Describes the section of the code or application affected, such as a module or component.

    • Example: fix(auth): corrected password hashing algorithm
  3. Description (Required): A short, concise description of the change, written in the imperative form (e.g., “add feature” instead of “added feature”).

  4. Body (Optional): A more detailed description of the change, providing additional context or technical details.

  5. Footer (Optional): Used for notes about breaking changes or references to issues or tickets.

    • Example: BREAKING CHANGE: remove deprecated authentication method

Example of a Conventional Commit message:

feat(parser): add ability to parse arrays

The parser now supports parsing arrays into lists.
This allows arrays to be passed as arguments to methods.

BREAKING CHANGE: Arrays are now parsed differently

Benefits of Conventional Commits:

  • Consistency: A uniform format for commit messages makes the project history easier to understand.
  • Automation: Tools can automatically generate versions, create changelogs, and even release builds based on commit messages.
  • Traceability: It becomes easier to track the purpose of a change, especially for bug fixes or new features.

Conventional Commits are especially helpful in projects using SemVer (Semantic Versioning) because they enable automatic versioning based on commit types.

 

 

 


Pipeline

In software development, a pipeline refers to an automated sequence of steps used to move code from the development phase to deployment in a production environment. Pipelines are a core component of Continuous Integration (CI) and Continuous Deployment (CD), practices that aim to develop and deploy software faster, more reliably, and consistently.

Main Components of a Software Development Pipeline:

  1. Source Control:

    • The process typically begins when developers commit new code to a version control system (e.g., Git). This code commit often automatically triggers the next step in the pipeline.
  2. Build Process:

    • The code is automatically compiled and built, transforming the source code into executable files, libraries, or other artifacts. This step also resolves dependencies and creates packages.
  3. Automated Testing:

    • After the build process, the code is automatically tested. This includes unit tests, integration tests, functional tests, and sometimes UI tests. These tests ensure that new changes do not break existing functionality and that the code meets the required standards.
  4. Deployment:

    • If the tests pass successfully, the code is automatically deployed to a specific environment. This could be a staging environment where further manual or automated testing occurs, or it could be directly deployed to the production environment.
  5. Monitoring and Feedback:

    • After deployment, the application is monitored to ensure it functions as expected. Errors and performance issues can be quickly identified and resolved. Feedback loops help developers catch issues early and continuously improve.

Benefits of a Pipeline in Software Development:

  • Automation: Reduces manual intervention and minimizes the risk of errors.
  • Faster Development: Changes can be deployed to production more frequently and quickly.
  • Consistency: Ensures all changes meet the same quality standards through defined processes.
  • Continuous Integration and Deployment: Allows code to be continuously integrated and rapidly deployed, reducing the response time to bugs and new requirements.

These pipelines are crucial in modern software development, especially in environments that embrace agile methodologies and DevOps practices.

 


Continuous Deployment - CD

Continuous Deployment (CD) is an approach in software development where code changes are automatically deployed to the production environment after passing automated testing. This means that new features, bug fixes, and other changes can go live immediately after successful testing. Here are the main characteristics and benefits of Continuous Deployment:

  1. Automation: The entire process from code change to production is automated, including building the software, testing, and deployment.

  2. Rapid Delivery: Changes are deployed immediately after successful testing, significantly reducing the time between development and end-user availability.

  3. High Quality and Reliability: Extensive automated testing and monitoring ensure that only high-quality and stable code reaches production.

  4. Reduced Risks: Since changes are deployed frequently and in small increments, the risks are lower compared to large, infrequent releases. Issues can be identified and fixed faster.

  5. Customer Satisfaction: Customers benefit from new features and improvements more quickly, enhancing satisfaction.

  6. Continuous Feedback: Developers receive faster feedback on their changes, allowing for quicker identification and resolution of issues.

A typical Continuous Deployment process might include the following steps:

  1. Code Change: A developer makes a change in the code and pushes it to a version control system (e.g., Git).

  2. Automated Build: A Continuous Integration (CI) server (e.g., Jenkins, CircleCI) pulls the latest code, builds the application, and runs unit and integration tests.

  3. Automated Testing: The code undergoes a series of automated tests, including unit tests, integration tests, and possibly end-to-end tests.

  4. Deployment: If all tests pass successfully, the code is automatically deployed to the production environment.

  5. Monitoring and Feedback: After deployment, the application is monitored to ensure it functions correctly. Feedback from the production environment can be used for further improvements.

Continuous Deployment differs from Continuous Delivery (also CD), where the code is regularly and automatically built and tested, but a manual release step is required to deploy it to production. Continuous Deployment takes this a step further by automating the final deployment step as well.

 


Subversion - SVN

Subversion, often abbreviated as SVN, is a widely-used version control system originally developed by CollabNet. It is designed to manage and track changes to files and directories over time. Subversion enables developers to efficiently manage, document, and synchronize changes to a project, especially when multiple people are working on the same project.

Key features of Subversion include:

  1. Centralized Repository: Subversion uses a centralized repository where all files and their changes are stored. Developers check their changes into this central repository and retrieve the latest versions of files from it.

  2. Versioning of Directories and Files: Subversion tracks changes not only to individual files but also to entire directories, making it easier to rename, move, or delete files and directories.

  3. Branching and Merging: Subversion supports creating branches and merging changes. This is particularly useful for parallel development of features or managing release versions.

  4. Atomic Commits: In Subversion, a commit is performed completely or not at all. This means all changes in a commit are treated as a single unit, ensuring data integrity.

  5. Collaborative Development: Subversion facilitates team collaboration by detecting conflicts when the same files are edited simultaneously and providing mechanisms for conflict resolution.

  6. Support for Binary Files: In addition to text files, Subversion can version binary files, making it versatile for various types of projects.

  7. Integration with Development Environments: Numerous plugins and tools integrate Subversion with development environments like Eclipse, Visual Studio, and others, simplifying the workflow for developers.

Subversion is used in many projects and organizations to make software development and management more efficient and traceable. Despite the increasing popularity of distributed version control systems like Git, Subversion remains a preferred choice in many settings due to its stability and proven functionality.

 


Code Review

A code review is a systematic process where other developers review source code to improve the quality and integrity of the software. During a code review, the code is examined for errors, vulnerabilities, style issues, and potential optimizations. Here are the key aspects and benefits of code reviews:

Goals of a Code Review:

  1. Error Detection: Identify and fix errors and bugs before merging the code into the main branch.
  2. Security Check: Uncover security vulnerabilities and potential security issues.
  3. Improve Code Quality: Ensure that the code meets established quality standards and best practices.
  4. Knowledge Sharing: Promote knowledge sharing within the team, allowing less experienced developers to learn from more experienced colleagues.
  5. Code Consistency: Ensure that the code is consistent and uniform, particularly in terms of style and conventions.

Types of Code Reviews:

  1. Formal Reviews: Structured and comprehensive reviews, often in the form of meetings where the code is discussed in detail.
  2. Informal Reviews: Spontaneous or less formal reviews, often conducted as pair programming or ad-hoc discussions.
  3. Pull-Request-Based Reviews: Review of code changes in version control systems (such as GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket) before merging into the main branch.

Steps in the Code Review Process:

  1. Preparation: The code author prepares the code for review, ensuring all tests pass and documentation is up to date.
  2. Creating a Pull Request: The author creates a pull request or a similar request for code review.
  3. Assigning Reviewers: Reviewers are designated to examine the code.
  4. Conducting the Review: Reviewers analyze the code and provide comments, suggestions, and change requests.
  5. Feedback and Discussion: The author and reviewers discuss the feedback and work together to resolve issues.
  6. Making Changes: The author makes the necessary changes and updates the pull request accordingly.
  7. Completion: After approval, the code is merged into the main branch.

Best Practices for Code Reviews:

  1. Constructive Feedback: Provide constructive and respectful feedback aimed at improving the code without demotivating the author.
  2. Prefer Small Changes: Review smaller, manageable changes to make the review process more efficient and effective.
  3. Use Automated Tools: Utilize static code analysis tools and linters to automatically detect potential issues in the code.
  4. Focus on Learning and Teaching: Use reviews as an opportunity to share knowledge and learn from each other.
  5. Time Limitation: Set time limits for reviews to ensure they are completed promptly and do not hinder the development flow.

Benefits of Code Reviews:

  • Improved Code Quality: An additional layer of review reduces the likelihood of errors and bugs.
  • Increased Team Collaboration: Encourages collaboration and the sharing of best practices within the team.
  • Continuous Learning: Developers continually learn from the suggestions and comments of their peers.
  • Code Consistency: Helps maintain a consistent and uniform code style throughout the project.

Code reviews are an essential part of the software development process, contributing to the creation of high-quality software while also fostering team dynamics and technical knowledge.

 


Mercurial

Mercurial, often abbreviated as "Hg," is a distributed version control system, similar to Git. It was developed to provide developers with the ability to track changes in source code, manage different versions of a project, and facilitate collaboration in software development projects.

Here are some key features and concepts of Mercurial:

  1. Distributed Version Control System: Like Git, Mercurial is a distributed version control system. Each developer has a local copy of the entire repository history, making it easier to collaborate in distributed teams.

  2. Commits: In Mercurial, changes are grouped into commits, each of which has a unique identifier and a message describing what was changed in that commit.

  3. Branches: Developers can create branches to work on different aspects of a project simultaneously without affecting the main development branch. Merging branches is also possible.

  4. Pull and Push: Similar to Git, developers can transfer changes between their local repositories and a central or another remote repository, typically done through pulling and pushing changes.

  5. Merging: Merging branches in Mercurial allows for integrating changes from one branch into another, which is particularly useful for incorporating new features or bug fixes into the main development branch.

  6. Web Interface: Mercurial often provides a web interface that facilitates tracking the project's history and collaboration. Users can view commits, branches, and more through the web interface.

  7. Controlled Distribution: Mercurial emphasizes a straightforward and intuitive user interface and is often considered easier to learn and use than some other version control systems.

Mercurial is used in various development projects and organizations, although Git has become much more popular in recent years. The choice between Mercurial and Git often depends on the individual preferences and requirements of the development team. Both systems serve the fundamental purposes of version control and enable efficient collaboration in software development projects.

 


Random Tech

ElasticSearch


Elasticsearch_logo.svg.png